Legal Opinion

State v. Patton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1986No. 8528SC1220PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to dismiss the charge of first degree burglary. The trial judge charged the jury that to find defendant guilty of first degree burglary that “the State must prove to you that at the time of the breaking and entering the Defendant intended to commit a felony, that is to say, larceny.” Defendant argues that there is insufficient evidence of intent to commit larceny to support his conviction for first degree burglary. We disagree.

First degree burglary is defined as the unlawful breaking and entering of an occupied…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. SweezySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. . McBrydeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. State v. ChurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. MangumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. State v. HowieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API