Saraski v. Dexter Davison Kosher Meat & Poultry

I agree, for the reasons stated by the majority, that in the present case, *355the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission did not err in concluding that defendant properly could reduce benefits under MCL 418.357; MSA 17.237(357). I would not, however, adopt or reject the "general rule of Krueger [v Simplicity Pattern Co, 196 Mich App 212; 492 NW2d 790 (1992).]” Ante, p 352.

I join in part in of the majority opinion.