Legal Opinion

Georgevich v. Strauss

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1982No. Civ. No. 81-0801PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MUIR, District Judge.

Plaintiff Anthony Georgevich filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. *194§ 1983 as well as a motion for class action certification on July 3, 1981. Georgevich, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, brought suit against his state court sentencing judge, the Honorable Samuel Strauss, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, and all judges similarly situated, alleging that certain parole determinations were made without sufficient procedural due process protections, in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Girsh v. JepsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Grunin v. International House of PancakesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. Teodore Dorotee Autera v. Manuel Dudley Robinson, Anthony C. Autera v. Manuel Dudley RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. Carl M. Pearson v. Harry A. Skydell and Arnold Dutchen v. Ecological Science Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. Georgevich v. StraussCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Turner v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007
  5. United States v. AltmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API