People v. Hartshorn
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’ROURKE, J.
Defendant Brandon Hartshorn appeals from an order granting a petition to extend his commitment pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 6500, following a jury finding he is a “mentally retarded person, is a danger to himself or others, and has serious difficulty controlling his dangerous behavior because of his mental retardation . . . .”1 Raising equal protection grounds, Hartshorn contends the trial court prejudicially erred by failing to instruct the jury that he posed a substantial risk of serious physical harm to himself or others to support a tme finding…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. AlexanderCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kern Regional Center v. H.S. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Kern Regional Center v. R.G. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- P. v. Fisher CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. G.A.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- People v. Ruiz CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.