Legal Opinion

People v. Hartshorn

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 2012No. D057874PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

O’ROURKE, J.

Defendant Brandon Hartshorn appeals from an order granting a petition to extend his commitment pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 6500, following a jury finding he is a “mentally retarded person, is a danger to himself or others, and has serious difficulty controlling his dangerous behavior because of his mental retardation . . . .”1 Raising equal protection grounds, Hartshorn contends the trial court prejudicially erred by failing to instruct the jury that he posed a substantial risk of serious physical harm to himself or others to support a tme finding…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. AlexanderCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kern Regional Center v. H.S. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. Kern Regional Center v. R.G. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. P. v. Fisher CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People v. G.A.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. People v. Ruiz CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API