ANDERSON v. Palmer
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
It is elementary law that the person alleging fraud must prove the allegation. Fraud is never presumed. In cases where the party accused of fraudulent conduct sustains a fiduciary relation to the party defrauded and the latter makes a prima facie case, the burden of proof shifts to the *140former, but in all oases the party charging fraud must adduce sufficient evidence either to prove fraud or a strong suspicion of fraud: Sabin v. Kyniston, 81 Or. 358 (159 Pac. 69); Benson v. Johnson, 85 Or. 677, 682 (165 Pac. 1001, 167 Pac. 1014).
In all of the cases relied upon by the appellants, placing the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harrington v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Mendenhall v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Stadelman v. MinerOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Benson v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Phipps v. WillisOregon Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Industrial Hospital Ass'n v. EgeOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Smith v. LovejoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Ray Wells, Inc. v. HargreavesOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Ray Wells, Inc. v. HargreavesOregon Supreme Court · 1988