In re Kuslansky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
*105The respondent was charged with six allegations of professional misconduct. The Special Referee sustained all but the fourth charge. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the Referee’s report to the extent that Charges One, Two, Three, Five and Six were sustained, and to disaffirm so much of the report as failed to sustain the fourth charge, and the respondent cross-moves, inter alia, to confirm the report to the extent that Charges One, Two and Three were sustained, and Charge Four was not sustained, and to disaffirm so much of the report as sustained Charges Five…
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018