Legal Opinion

VSE Corporation v. Koretzky

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided December 20, 2019No. 2:19-cv-10827Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VSE CORPORATION CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 19-10827 HAROLD KORETZKY AND CARVER, SECTION “R” (4) DARDEN, KORETZKY, TESSIER, FINN, BLOSSMAN & AREAUX, L.L.C. ORDER AND REASONS The Court has received the amended motion to stay and administratively close the current proceedings from plaintiff VSE Corporation.1 Because neither the interests of justice nor federal statute requires a stay, the Court denies the motion. I. BACKGROUND This case arises from alleged legal malpractice. Plaintiff retained defendants to draft a Collective Bargaining…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Hershel Hiram McKnight v. C. H. Blanchard, Sheriff of Lubbock County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. Midwest Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Commonwealth Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API