Legal Opinion

Ballantine v. Dominican Republic

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 11, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-3598Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LISA BALLANTINE et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 19-cv-3598 (TJK) DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, Defendant, MEMORANDUM OPINION Lisa and Michael Ballantine initiated arbitration against the Dominican Republic to resolve an investment dispute. The arbitration panel found that it lacked jurisdiction over the Ballantines’ claims under the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement and issued an award in favor of the Dominican Republic. The Ballantines moved for this Court to vacate the award under the Federal Arbitration Act…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Florasynth, Inc. v. Alfred PickholzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Aerea BolivianaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  3. Luise Light v. Isabel WolfCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  4. Republic of Sudan v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  5. Picciano v. PetriccaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API