Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Mendenhall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 13, 1956No. 15669PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

From a judgment for common-law-damages in behalf of the plaintiff and insurance company intervenor (under subrogation provisions of the Texas Workmen’s Compensation Law, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 8306 et seq.) against third party tort-feasor defendants — the defendants appeal. Total amount of damages awarded was $73,219.-54.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendants Wesley Stephens and Morris Stephens were partners in the oil field trucking business, doing business as Stephens Trucking 'Company. Hayden Farmer was a drilling contractor engaged in oil field operations. Employed by the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Aultman v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Ramirez v. AckerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Goforth v. AlveyTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. International-Great Northern R. v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hill v. Forrest & Cotton, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Cactus Drilling Company v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Jim Sowell Construction Co. v. Dallas Central Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
  4. Querner v. De SpainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Burr v. Apex Concrete Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API