Legal Opinion
Lewis & Michael, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Administrative Services
Ohio Court of Claims
Decided November 1, 1999No. 98-04891PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRED J. Shoemaker, Judge.
Plaintiff Lewis & Michael, Inc. brought this action against defendant Department of Administrative Services seeking damages in the form of profits that it claims it would have earned had defendant not wrongfully awarded a public contract to one of its competitors. The case was tried to the court on the sole issue of defendant’s liability.
In 1997, defendant solicited bids for the “transportation and related moving services to relocate department of ODOT, personnel and equipment * * * in two *31(2) phases.” Plaintiff submitted a bid for the project containing a combined…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cedar Bay Construction, Inc. v. City of FremontOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Leaseway Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hardrives Paving & Construction, Inc. v. City of NilesOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- National Engineering & Contracting Co. v. Cleveland (City)Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1957
- BFI Waste Systems v. City of Garfield HeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fabrizi Recycling, Inc. v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- N.L. Constr. Corp. v. Freed Hous. Corp., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012