Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Daniell

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 14, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

In this proceeding for the settlement of the account of the substituted trustees construction of the will is required for the purpose of determining the distribution of the remainder which the testator directed be disposed of in accordance with the instructions contained in the subjoined text of paragraph Ninth of his will.

“ Ninth Paragraph: I give and bequeath to my son, John Francis Daniell and my secretary, Charles F. Goetz the sum of Seventy-five Thousand, To have and to hold in trust, however, for the following uses and purposes, To invest the same in the dry goods…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of SeebeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of BurnettNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
  3. Holbrook v. ShepardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. In re the Accounting of Chase Manhattan BankNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Holbrook v. Shepard, GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Accounting of WiltseNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API