Legal Opinion

Waltmon v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided April 17, 2002No. 09-01-282 CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

76 S.W.3d 148 (2002)

Robert Eric WALTMON, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 09-01-282 CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

Submitted November 28, 2001.

Decided April 17, 2002.

Steven M. Hollis, Jasper, for appellant.

Guy James Gray, Criminal District Attorney, Patrick Hardy, Assistant Criminal District Attorney, Jasper, for state.

Before WALKER, C.J., BURGESS and GAULTNEY, JJ.

OPINION

RONALD L. WALKER, Chief Justice.

The record before us reflects that appellant pleaded guilty without benefit of an agreed recommendation of punishment with the State. Appellant elected to have a jury assess…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API