Sierra Pacific Industries v. Lyng
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs, logging and timber firms, brought separate actions in California and Oregon against defendants, the Secretary of Agriculture and U.S. Forest Service officials, challenging the validity of regulations issued to implement § 2 of the Federal Timber Contract Payment Modification Act, 16 U.S.C. § 618 (Supp. IY 1986) (“the Act”). The Act allows holders of certain federal timber contracts to be released from their contractual obligations upon payment of a “buy-out” charge! The plaintiffs appeal those portions of the district courts’ orders sustaining three of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- National Wildlife Federation v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Saratoga Savings and Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Lone Rock Timber Co. v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1994
- Mt. Adams Veneer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Feehan v. MarconeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.