Legal Opinion

Barber v. Gordon

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1931No. Docket No. 4240PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE PLUMMER Delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The actions above named were consolidated and tried as one. Both actions were prosecuted to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been suffered in an automobile collision. The complaint in both cases alleged the negligence of the defendant. The defendant in both cases set out, among other matters, inevitable accident as one of the grounds for her defense.

The record shows that the appellants were driving northerly on a public highway in the county of Ventura. At the same time, respondent was driving southerly. As the respective…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Long v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Guile v. SnyderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bonacci v. CerraNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Rayner v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Bunkfeldt v. Country Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Keating v. ZumwaltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Bogert v. ClawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API