Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 21, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel as a result of his trial counsel’s failure to move for a severance of his trial from that of his codefendant (see People v Velez, 78 AD3d 1522, 1522-1523 [2010]; People v Alvarenga, 25 AD3d 560, 561 [2006]; People v Ruger, 288 AD2d 686, 687 [2001]). “Nor does the defendant’s disagreement with his trial counsel’s tactics on cross-examination render the representation less than meaningful” (People v Alvarenga, 25 AD3d at 561; see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712-713 [1998]; People v Aiken, 45…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. VelcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. VelcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Rodriguez v. LaValleyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API