Legal Opinion

Kcst-Tv, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 25, 1983No. 81-2265PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMM, Circuit Judge:

The network non-duplication rules generally provide that a cable system located within a certain distance of a network-affiliated television station must delete the duplicative network programming of a distant station that is carried on the system. An exception to the rules, which is found in 47 C.F.R. § 76.92(g), is that a cable system-need not delete the programming of a television signal that is significantly viewed in the community where the system is located. The policy of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission or FCC) is to keep a station on the list of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Wait Radio v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. Carter Mountain Transmission Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. BellSouth Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  2. Alltel Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, National Exchange Carrier Association, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  3. Prayze Fm, Also Known as Incom, L.L.C., Mark Blake and Loretta Spivey v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. Garrett v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Texas Power & Light Company v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API