Nome-Sinook Co. v. Simpson
District Court, D. Alaska
Application of the town of Nome to intervene in a suit brought by the applicant for a mining patent under section 2325, Rev. St. [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1429], against an adverse claimant.
1Opinion of the Court
W ICKERSHAM, District Judge.
This is an application by the town of Nome for leave to intervene in this action. Objection by plaintiff and defendant.
On August 6, 1901, the defendant applied, under the provisions of sections 2325 and 2326 of the Revised Statutes of the United States [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 1429, 1430], for a patent to the Simpson placer mine, located over a portion of the main town of Nome, and in the Cape Nome mining district. Within the time limited by law the plaintiff filed an adverse claim in the land office, and began this suit in ejectment to recover a portion of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Shoshone Mining Co. v. RutterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Parker v. Winnipiseogee Lake Cotton & Woollen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Gwillim v. DonnellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Blackburn v. Portland Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gavigan v. CraryDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1905