Legal Opinion
Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. Prosser
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 2012No. 2012AP566-JPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. On April 17, 2012, Justice David T. Prosser's Attorney, Kevin P Reak, wrote and asked me to disqualify myself from participation in the above-captioned matter, asserting that I am a material witness. Because Attorney Reak is the attorney of record for Justice Prosser in this proceeding and because his letter was copied to the Clerk of the Supreme Court and counsel for the Judicial Commission, I have interpreted Attorney Reak's April 17 letter as a motion for me to self-disqualify from participation in the above-captioned proceeding, *295pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 757.19(2)(b) (2009-10).1 On…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Matter of RyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- County of Dane v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Barnard v. Board of EducationWashington Supreme Court · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. ProsserWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012