Fuller v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Harrison Gweuit Gowrt. The plaint ffs allege that they are the absolute owners of. certain land in ITa rison county, Iowa, which was sold for delinquent taxes in 1872, and deeded to the defendant Fletcher Armstrong, in 1876, and that before the execution of the tax deed the defendant Armstrong did not cause to be served a-notice of the expiration of the period of redemption as required by section 894 of the Code.
Read the full summary
Appeal from, Harrison Gweuit Gowrt. The plaint ffs allege that they are the absolute owners of. certain land in ITa rison county, Iowa, which was sold for delinquent taxes in 1872, and deeded to the defendant Fletcher Armstrong, in 1876, and that before the execution of the tax deed the defendant Armstrong did not cause to be served a-notice of the expiration of the period of redemption as required by section 894 of the Code. Plaintiffs pray that an account be taken of the rents and profits, and of the taxes paid by the defendants, and that the title of the plaintiffs be quieted. The answer…
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
i. tax deed notice. ’ It was agreed by the parties that prior to April 8, 1876,-the date of the treasurer’s deed, the premises were unoccupied, and the title thereto was in W. F. Ooolbaugh. The plaintiff introdcued in evidence what purports to be a notice to W. F. Ooolbaugh, of the time when the time for redemption would expire.' The affidavit of publication was made by Alpheus Davidson, editor and publisher of the Harrison Oounty Courier. In the view which we take of the case it is not necessary to determine as to the sufficiency of this notice. Section 894 of the Code requires notice to be…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Bennett v. GreenwaltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Crawford v. LiddleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Grove v. BenedictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Knudson v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Parker v. CochranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.