Travelers Insurance v. Albin
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
1. Whether the judgment of the lower court should be reversed or affirmed depends upon the construction of certain sections of the workmen’s compensation act (Ga. L. 1920, p. 167). It was not insisted that total incapacity to work resulted from the injury to the ear. Under the facts shown by the record, should the award for partial incapacity be sustained? Section 31 of said act (pp. 183, 184) is in part as follows: “That except as otherwise provided in the next section hereafter, when the incapacity for work resulting from the injury is partial, the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Zinken v. Melrose Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- Betz v. Columbia Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Blue Bell Globe Manufacturing Co. v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Diamond Coal Co. v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Special Indemnity Fund v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.