Legal Opinion

Estate of Kinnaman v. Mountain West Bank, N.A.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 2016No. DA 15-0305PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 The underlying case is the third lawsuit arising from a project to develop condominiums at Lakeside Village on Hauser Lake in Lewis and Clark County (the condos). The project’s developer, Cherrad, LLC (Cherrad), its lender, Mountain West Bank (the Bank), and the estate of its general contractor, Craig Rumanian (the Estate), were all parties to the second lawsuit. In this third suit, the Estate brought eight claims against the Bank that the Bank argued were barred by the compulsory counterclaim rule or the doctrine of claim preclusion. The District Court found that the Estate’s claims were…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Baltrusch v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. LohMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Brilz v. Metropolitan General InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Albert v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Arnold v. Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Cline v. PritchardMontana Supreme Court · 2026
  3. Marriage of DeCockMontana Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API