Lowe v. State

On Motion for Rehearing.

In his motion for rehearing appellant urges error in the refusal of his motion for new trial upon several grounds, mainly because the trial court held that no error had been committed in allowing the juror Darelik to sit in the trial of the case, and also that there was no error shown in the separation of the jury.

Deference to the forcible argument of appellant’s counsel and a desire to be right in *679conclusion has led ns to examine many authorities and mate careful study of these questions. We have been unable to find a single authority which holds that if a juror,…