Kyle v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of slander. Motion was made to quash the information. The complaint and information are in harmony with each other and the information follows the complaint in its averments. The charging part is as follows: "That appellant did falsely and maliciously and falsely and wantonly impute to one Donie Lee, then and there an unmarried female, a want of chastity in this, that he, the said J. H. Kyle, did then and there, in the presence and hearing of J. J. Heal, falselv, maliciously and wantonly sav of and concerning the said Donie Lee, to the said J.…
2Cited by2 opinions
- West and Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Delaney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933