Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Phinney v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1899No. 3214PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Original Application for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar. J.

In April, 1895, George H. Ileilbron died. He left a will, commonly called a “non-intervention will,” bequeathing his property to various relatives and appointing certain persons executors of the will. In May following, the will was admitted to probate, and the executors have continued in the administration of the estate, uninterrupted by the superior court, until after the taking effect of the law passed by the legislature in 1897, which we will hereafter notice. The estate was valued at about $13,000, against which there were liabilities…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dwyer v. KalteyerTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Balch v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Lumpkin v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Newport v. NewportWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Moore v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. New York Merchandise Co. v. StoutWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Bayer v. BayerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Golden v. McGillWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In Re Megrath's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Strand v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API