Legal Opinion
People v. McQueen
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 27, 1966PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.
The conviction of appellant of murder in the second degree should be affirmed unless its correctness is controlled by Miranda v. Arizona (384 U. S. 436). The dispo*342sition of the appeal depends upon whether the prearraignment confessions of appellant and her re-enactment of the crime should have been excluded for the reason that she was not informed before the law enforcement officers started to question her that she need not answer, that whatever she said might be used against her or that she was entitled to counsel and that, if indigent, she was entitled to have counsel assigned, as required…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- People v. TarsiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. MoralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. JordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- United States of America Ex Rel. Joseph Hughes v. Hon. Daniel McMann Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- People v. AveniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.