Legal Opinion

National Bank of Stamford v. Recreational Acreage Exchange, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

*154OPINION OF THE COURT

Mercure, J.

In this action to foreclose a mortgage, defendant Englert, Stillman, Coffey, McHugh & Maggs (hereinafter defendant), a junior lienor, opposes plaintiff’s summary judgment motion upon the ground that the mortgage is not enforceable because the applicable mortgage recording tax was not paid (see, Tax Law §§ 253, 256, 258). The May 30, 1985 mortgage, given as security for indebtedness of $87,000 payable in accordance with a simultaneous promissory note, contained the following "future advances clause”: "The Mortgagee may make advances in the future to the Mortgagor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Bank v. FioravantiNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Citizens National Bank & Trust Co. v. Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
  3. In re WBVM AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Rockefeller Center, Inc. v. BragaliniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API