Legal Opinion

Polarus Steamship Co. v. The T/S Sandefjord

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 20, 1956No. Nos. 365, 366, Dockets 24002, 24003PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, Circuit Judge.

At about two o’clock in the morning of July 11, 1951, two tankers, each over four hundred feet long, approaching one another in a fog from opposite directions, *271collided some forty odd miles at sea in the travelled highway off Barnegat Inlet on the New Jersey coast. The district judge found that one of the vessels, the Sandefjord, was solely to blame, and she appeals.

The Polarusoil, which had no radar, was bound for Texas on a southerly course and the Sandefjord was heading north from Philadelphia to New York. Except for the fog, which “was a changing, fluid thing,”…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. The ChattahoocheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. The “Colorado”Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. The MartelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Afran Transport Co. v. The BergechiefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. SKIBS A/S SILJESTAD v. S/S Mathew LuckenbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  3. O/Y Finlayson-Forssa A/B v. Pan Atlantic Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  4. Barrois Bros., Inc. v. Lake Tankers CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1960
  5. Moran Towing & Transportation Co., Inc., Libellant-Appellee v. Conners-Standard Marine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API