Ray Stringer Co., Ltd. v. Dillon

— The appellee brought suit against the appellants for damages alleged to have been sustained by him, because of fraudulent conduct resorted to by appellants in inducing the appellee to purchase certain peanut vending machines from appellants. The issues consisted of a complaint in one paragraph and an answer in general denial.

The case was tried to the court without a jury. Upon request the court found the facts specially and stated its conclusion-of law thereon, which were in favor of appellee. Judgment was rendered in harmony with the conclusion of law. From this judgment appellants have…