Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Schusheim

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Suozzi, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the action against George Naiman on the grounds that no order of the court was obtained permitting his joinder as a party defendant (CPLB 305), and that he is not subject to the jurisdiction of the court ('CPLB3211, subd. [a], par. 8).

This is a consolidated action in which damages are sought against multiple named defendants who allegedly conspired with the principal defendant, Mark Matthews, for the purpose of *177assisting him in fraudulently misrepresenting his financial worth to induce the plaintiff to accept a property agreement in settlement of a marital action.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Town of Hancock v. . First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Franklin v. Rumsey Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ABKCO Industries, Inc. v. LennonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Orchard Park Central School District v. Orchard Park Teachers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. 417 East Realty Associates v. RyanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API