Legal Opinion

Copland v. Summ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant Gene Summ is the owner of a season ticket subscription to four courtside seats to New York Knickerbockers basketball games at Madison Square Garden. The plaintiff Richard Copland, an attorney, and the plaintiff Joel Taman, a business associate of the defendant Summ, have for inany seasons been beneficiaries of Summ’s generosity insofar as they, and several others over the years, have regularly been permitted to purchase, at face value, a significant number of his very desirable tickets. The parties’ informal arrangement apparently functioned smoothly until the Knicks reached the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sharp v. KosmalskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Bontecou v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Martin v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marini v. LombardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Cooney v. CooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Brand v. LiptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Fiore v. FioreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Istel v. IstelNew York Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API