Legal Opinion

Albert v. Franchot

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 26, 2024No. 1:22-cv-01558Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND STEVEN G. ALBERT, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil No. 1:22-cv-01558-JRR v. PETER FRANCHOT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the court is Defendant’s1 (the “Comptroller”) Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 16; the “Motion”). No hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2023). For the reasons that follow, by accompanying order, the Motion will be granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Steven Albert and Barry Diamond initiated this class action against the Comptroller challenging the Maryland…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  5. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API