Knecht, Inc. v. United Pacific Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCowen, Circuit Judge
I
I agree with my colleagues that the district court erred in awarding attorneys’ fees. There exists, however, an additional and independent basis to reverse the grant of attorneys’ fees, even if we had determined that fees were allowable. The district court clearly failed to make the findings of fact required by this Court’s decision in Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. v. American Radiator & Sanitary Corp., 487 F.2d 161 (3d Cir.1973) (Lindy I).
In Lindy I, we stated that “the first inquiry of the Court should be into ... how many hours were spent in what manner by which attorneys____ After…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pawlak v. GreenawaltCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Exton Drive-In, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank v. The Ohio Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Pennsylvania Supply Co. v. National Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Brock's Assigned Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.