Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lightfoot v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 12, 2013No. 1120200Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partShaw, Justice

The petitioner, Reginald Tyrone Light-foot, was convicted of trafficking in cocaine, see Ala.Code 1975, § 13A-12-231(2). He challenges whether his sentence was properly “enhanced” under Ala.Code 1975, § 13A-12-231(13),7 which essentially provided that any person who possessed a firearm during the commission of an offense falling within § 13A-12-231 would be sentenced to five years’ imprisonment “in addition to, and not in lieu of, the punishment otherwise provided .... ”

As the Court of Criminal Appeals held in its opinion in this case: “[T]he trial court’s application of the enhancement to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Poole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API