Legal Opinion
Judin v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 8, 1995No. 573-89CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action for alleged patent infringement.1 Pending before the court is a Motion for Sanctions under RCFC 11 brought by third-party defendant Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) against plaintiff Herbert Judin and his current and previous counsel (hereinafter “sanction defendants”). In addition, the motion seeks attorney fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 (1988). Also pending are plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Sanctions against HP, and HP’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Cross-Motion. The motions raise the question of what inquiry must be made by counsel and the patent…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- White v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Herbert Judin v. The United States, and Hewlett-Packard CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Miller-Holzwarth, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020