Legal Opinion

Hemenway v. Knudson

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Charles P. Hemenway and others against Morris F. Knudson and others. From an order settling interrogatories and cross interrogatories to be annexed to certain commissions, defendants appeal. RsvGrssd •

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

Upon an examination of the cross interrogatories, the exclusion of which forms the subject-matter of this appeal, it *680would appear that most of them were certainly pertinent to the subject-matter inquired of by the direct interrogatories of the various witnesses; and they certainly were not so clearly irrelevant to the issues which were involved, and to the testimony sought to be introduced by the direct interrogatories, that the court, at special term, in the settlement of interrogatories, should have excluded the same. The rights of the parties could have been amply protected by allowing the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shafer v. McIntyreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Hemenway v. KnudsonNew York Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API