Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hamilton Bank, N.A. v. Kookmin Bank

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 15, 2001No. Docket No. 99-7595Published

1DissentKearse, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from so much of the majority’s decision as affirms the granting of summary judgment dismissing the claim of plaintiff Hamilton Bank, N.A. (“Hamilton”), for a declaratory judgment that defendant Kookmin Bank (“Kook-min”) is not entitled to collect on the letter of credit dishonored by Hamilton. I am not persuaded, on the present record, taken in the light most favorable to Hamilton as the party opposing summary judgment, that that claim may be resolved as a matter of law.

I am in agreement with the majority that in initially rejecting the letter of credit, Hamilton failed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of Cochin, Ltd. v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company and St. Lucia Enterprises, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. Boston Hides & Furs, Ltd. v. Sumitomo Bank, Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
  3. Hamilton Bank, N.A. v. Kookmin BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API