Legal Opinion

A.B. v. Division of Medical Assistance & Health Services

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 21, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

S.L. REISNER, J.A.D.

A.B. appeals from a final determination of the Director of the Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services (DMAHS) denying her Medicaid benefits because her husband refused to name the State of New Jersey as first remainder beneficiary on his commercial annuity. The parties stipulated that the annuity was purchased to provide income to the husband and that it was not purchased for the purpose of enabling A.B. to qualify for Medicaid benefits. We reverse.

I

The parties stipulated to the following material facts:

1. The applicant,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Cleary, Cleary v. WaldmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. F.K. v. Division of Medical Assistance & Health Services & Ocean County Board of Social ServicesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  5. Johnson v. GuhlCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. NM v. Division of Medical Assistance and Health ServicesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  2. James Ex Rel. James v. RichmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. King v. SECRETARY, DEP. OF HEALTH AND HOSP.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. J.P. v. Division of Medical AssistanceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  5. Ab v. DmahsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API