Legal Opinion

Peters v. Peters

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1932No. Appeal, 5PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Schaefer,

In this declaratory judgment proceeding we are'called upon to construe a home-made will. Like some other home-made articles, it is awkward and clumsy in expression. Harry E. Peters, one of the legatees, provided for in it, being dissatisfied with the conclusions of the court below, asks us to review them in so far as they affect him.

The material parts of the document in which the testator, E. F. Peters, refers to himself in the third person, read: “The property of said E. F. Peters is to be distributed according to the intestate laws of Pennsylvania to the heirs…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schuldt v. Reading Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Pattin v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Dodson v. BallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  4. Cross v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. In re Estate of JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hart EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Dauphin County · 1955
  2. Simpson Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API