Legal Opinion

Meredith Corp. v. Iowa Department of Job Service

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 16, 1982No. 66496Published

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

Meredith Corporation contends that under chapter 96, The Code 1977, private retirement benefits paid to an employee in a lump sum must offset unemployment benefits for each month for which it was paid, not just the month the lump-sum payment was received.

The facts are essentially undisputed. Pursuant to company policy, Arvilla Thompson retired from Meredith at age 65. She elected to receive her retirement pension in the form of a lump-sum payment instead of periodic payments. Thereafter she sought unemployment benefits, which were granted by a claims deputy after a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Buchholtz v. Iowa Department of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Holmes v. CookCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  4. Zabrowski v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Administrator, Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API