Legal Opinion

People v. Gilmore

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 29, 2005No. 2-03-1105PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Callum

I. INTRODUCTION

A jury found defendant, Paul S. Gilmore, guilty of murder (720 ILCS 5/9 — 1(a)(1) (West 2000)), and the trial court sentenced him to 32 years’ imprisonment. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred by (1) admitting, pursuant to the dying declaration exception to the hearsay rule, statements the victim made to police officers while receiving treatment at the hospital and (2) summarily denying his pro se posttrial motion alleging that his trial counsel was ineffective. We affirm the trial court’s decision to admit the victim’s statements but must remand the cause…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. TislerIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. BullIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Leon Davis, Jr. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. NesbittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. People v. PeacockAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Harkins v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. SalemIllinois Supreme Court · 2016

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API