Legal Opinion
Strickland v. Marshall Construction & Repair, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided November 30, 1988No. Civ. 6483PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INGRAM, Judge.
Marshall Construction & Repair, Inc. (Marshall), filed a petition for declaratory-relief, seeking to have the court determine whether an injury suffered by an employee, Richard Strickland, was compensable under the Alabama workmen’s compensation act, § 25-5-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975. Following an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court determined that the employee’s injury did not “arise out of and in the course of his employment” and, therefore, was not compensable.
Strickland appeals.
Marshall is a Mobile, Alabama, company engaged in the commercial construction business. At the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Slimfold Mfg. Co. v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Anderson v. Custom Caterers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- WIREGRASS COMP. MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC INC. v. PriceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Moesch v. BALDWIN CTY. ELEC. MEMBERSHIP CORP.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Ray Motels, Inc. v. GriffinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ex Parte StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Strickland v. Marshall Construction & Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Ex Parte StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Strickland v. Marshall Construction & Repair, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989