Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 2, 1974No. 12146PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SMITH

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendants were convicted of rape and burglary and sentenced to concurrent terms of 30-60 years and 5-15 years respectively. For reversal they urge, (1) insufficiency of proof, (2) denial of the effective assistance of counsel, (3) denial of their motion to suppress evidence, and (4) remarks by the court and arguments of counsel. They question, too,' the severity of the sentences and request our interposition in reducing them.

That the burglary and rape occurred is not questioned. Questioned is whether defendants were responsible.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The People v. CaldwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. The PEOPLE v. McCasleIllinois Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. TherriaultAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. People v. MengAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. People v. SchulzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. People v. HalluinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. People v. NovakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API