Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Snider

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7476PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The first and second paragraphs of the complaint of the appellees are founded upon bills of exchange, drawn by Louis Snider and accepted by the firm of Smith & Hall, of which it is alleged all the appellants were members. Demurrers were unsuccessfully addressed to each of these paragraphs, and appellants complain of the action of the court in overruling them.

The contention of the appellants is, that the complaint does not show any title in the appellees to the bills of exchange sued on, and that no right in appellees to maintain an action thereon is shown by the complaint. The allegations…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. CopelandIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Reed v. GarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Jaccard v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  4. Barcus v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Rousch v. DuffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nysewander v. LowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Bowlus v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State ex rel. MacKenzie v. CasteelIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Ragsdale v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. State v. WenzelIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API