Legal Opinion
McClintock v. City of Roseburg
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.
"We think the statute is very clear and plainly authorizes municipalities to maintain and own airports. The reading of the statute is as follows:
“Sec. 7091. Any incorporated city or town of this state shall have the right to appropriate any private real property, * * for the general use and benefit of the people of said city or town, including real property, for an aviation field or park, * * .” 1925 Gen. L. 162, Chap. 106.
This language does not require any construction or interpretation. It does not admit of argument or controversy as to its meaning. The city, having taken the necessary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Wichita v. ClappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Churchill v. Grants PassOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- City of McMinnville v. HowenstineOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Dallas v. HallockOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- State ex rel. City of Lincoln v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aviation Services, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Hanover Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Burnham v. Mayor & Aldermen of BeverlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Morris v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- People Ex Rel. Curren v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Ruth v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.