Legal Opinion
Murphy v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1953PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil
On February 8,1952, Virgil Murphy was placed under arrest by two highway patrolmen and his automobile searched under the following circumstances:
“The Highway Patrol, two of them stopped the defendant on the public road at or near Baxter Cross Roads, some seven, eight or nine miles west of Cooke-ville, and they checked his driver’s license, which the highway patrolmen had a right to do, and that they then asked him about searching his automobile, and that he, Virgil Murphy, told them he didn’t want them to search without a search warrant, probably rather they wouldn’t or words to that effect.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- People v. DeforeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- State v. GibbonsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Hughes v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- Robertson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Lloyd BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Morgan v. Town of HeidelbergMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Faulkner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- State v. RuudNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Pruitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.