Cleveland Railway Co. v. Owens

OPINION

By LEMERT, PJ.

In reference to the first alleged ground of error, from an examination of the record before us. we are convinced that there was no error in refusing to hold that there was a joint enter-prise between plaintiff and Pyler. The record is clear that the plaintiff was riding as an invited guest of Pyler, and there is nothing in the record that indicates by way of arrangement, act or conduct between them that would warrant the court in charging that there was a joint enterprise.

On the second alleged ground of error an : examination of the récord convinces us that there was…