Legal Opinion

Tong v. Matthews

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1856PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal /rom St. Frangois Circuit Court. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, Judge

This is an action of covenant for a breach of warranty on the sale of lands. The measure of damages assumed by the court was the purchase money paid with interest. This has always been understood to be the rule as to damages in such actions in this state. (Tapley v. Labeaume’s Exec’r, 1 Mo. 393; Martin v. Long, 3 Mo. 391; Dunnica v. Sharpe, 7 Mo. 71.)

An attempt was made to increase the damages by showing that the vendor was guilty of a fraud in not disclosing his knowledge of a want of title in himself. The cause was tried by the court, and the fact of fraud was negatived by its finding. We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Benton v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1823
  2. Dunnica v. SharpSupreme Court of Missouri · 1841
  3. Martin v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1834

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hazelett v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API