Legal Opinion
In re Feldesman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 19, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The bankrupt moves for an order permitting her to file amended schedules so as to list the Morris Plan Company as a creditor. No such claim was included on the original schedules, and the omitted creditor filed no claim. The motion is made some twenty months after adjudication. Meanwhile, the bankrupt has long since obtained her discharge.
To extend to the bankrupt the relief asked for would work a manifest injustice on the creditor. The six months within which proof of claim may be filed expired over a year ago. It is settled law that after the termination of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Birkett v. Columbia BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- In re HawkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- In re SpicerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1906
- In re TroskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- In re AtlasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re SchefflerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1937
- In re MargolisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- In re MathersDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1940