Legal Opinion
Amax Nickel Refining Co. v. United Steelworkers, Local No. 8373
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 13, 1988No. 88-CA-0405PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRY, Judge.
The United Steelworkers of America (Union) appeals the denial of its motion to dissolve a consent permanent injunction which was issued during a labor dispute in 1979. The issue is the duration of a consent injunction and its applicability to a later strike.
On August 31, 1979 the collective bargaining agreement between the Union and appellee Amax Nickel Refining Company expired and the Union went on strike. On September 2,1979 Amax filed a petition for injunctive relief alleging numerous acts of violence and mass picketing. That same day both parties consented to a temporary…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The Drummond Company, a Corporation v. District 20, United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Baton Rouge Etc. v. Gen. Truck, Etc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- American Cyanamid Co. v. RobertsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Tenneco, Inc. v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union, Local 4-522Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pineville Police Officers' Ass'n, Local 1990 v. City of PinevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Amax Nickel Refining Co. v. United Steelworkers, Local No. 8373Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989