Sheley v. Whitman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayue. (Jennison, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
Sheley sued Whitman for the price of certain gas chandeliers and pipe. The defense was the statute of frauds, the articles being worth $200. The court below allowed a recovery.
Plaintiff has a store and stock of goods in Detroit. Defendant, having a private house in Detroit which he desired to have furnished, came into the store in pursuance of plaintiff’s invitation, and was shown a number of articles for which the price was fixed at $200.' He gave no order then. Afterwards he wrote this letter, the essential parts of which were these:
“You may place the gas fixtures I selected to-day. ' The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- James v. MuirMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by3 opinions
- Benedek v. Mechanical Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Harris Photographic Supply Co. v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Wagner-White Co. v. Holland Co-operative Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1923